Fitwear

Updated 19 August 2026

Acloset vs Indyx

Acloset does more things. Indyx does fewer things better. That is the whole comparison, and everything below is you deciding which of those you actually want.

We make a rival app. It gets one paragraph at the end and nothing before it.
AclosetIndyx
Rating4.4 across roughly 4,700 ratings4.8 across roughly 1,500 ratings
Entry priceFree with ads and a 100-item cap; Basic $3.99 for 300 items$12.99 a month, $74.99 a year
What the money buysCloset capacity and no ads. AI images draw on beans, sold separately from $1.99The whole product, including unlimited outfit selfies. No second currency
Feature breadthCalendar, wear tracking, cost-per-wear, personal colour, fit diagnosis, email import, multi-item detection, community, marketplaceWardrobe, outfits, collections, open closets, analytics
Human stylistsNoYes — three outfits from about $60, ten from about $150
PlatformsiOS, Android, web; 18 languagesiOS-first
AdsOn the free tierNone

Pick Acloset if you want a wardrobe measured

The tracking layer is the reason to be here. Log what you wear, and cost-per-wear turns a $200 coat worn forty times into a $5 coat, which changes how you shop more than any styling suggestion will. Add the calendar, the colour analysis and the email import that pulls in orders you forgot about, and you have a tool for people who want their wardrobe as data. The entry price is among the lowest in the category.

The catch is the shape of the pricing. You are paying for shelf space, and archived garments still count against your limit — their own help pages say so, because storage costs them money. Anything AI-generated draws on beans bought separately, and their terms let them change what a bean buys.

Pick Indyx if you want fewer decisions

It is the most refined app in the category and the one reviewers reach for. The pricing is also the plainest here: one subscription, everything included, unlimited outfit selfies, nothing to top up. For someone who resents metering — and metering is what both Acloset and Whering do, just under different names — that alone is worth the higher sticker.

Then there is the stylist. Being able to hand your actual wardrobe to a person for $60 is a different product from anything automated, and it is the reason a chunk of their users are there.

The honest summary

If price per feature is your measure, Acloset wins and it is not close. If you have ever abandoned an app because it kept asking you to buy something mid-task, Indyx is worth the $12.99. Neither is a bad choice, and the free tiers are enough to tell within a week which one you keep opening.

Who wrote this

We are Fitwear, and we make a third app here. Our angle is the render itself: a full layered outfit — nine pieces on one of our models on any plan, shoes and jewellery included, or three on the free plan and nine on PRO if you render on your own photo — in one image, with a set number included each month, and outfits built for a stated occasion out of the clothes you already own. We are newer and smaller than both apps above and have no ratings yet, which is exactly why we wrote about them rather than about us.